Military families now have better options for seeking compensation in medical malpractice cases. Here’s what’s changed:
- Higher Non-Economic Damage Caps: As of October 20, 2023, the cap for non-economic damages (like pain and suffering) increased from $600,000 to $750,000.
- Offset Rule Revision: Starting May 10, 2024, offsets for government-provided benefits (like VA disability payments) will only apply to economic damages, not total payouts.
- Expanded Eligibility: Active-duty service members and their families can now file claims for injuries or deaths caused by medical negligence at military facilities.
- Strict Deadlines: Claims must be filed within two years of the malpractice incident.
These updates aim to address long-standing issues, but challenges remain – only 2% of claims are currently approved. Legal guidance is essential for navigating this process and securing fair compensation.
From Medical Malpractice to Champion Athlete: Dez Del Barba Shares His Incredible Story
Recent Pentagon Policy Updates on Medical Malpractice Caps
The Department of Defense has rolled out two notable policy changes that reshape how military medical malpractice claims are assessed and compensated.
October 2023 Policy Update Details
One of the key updates involves a periodic adjustment to malpractice compensation caps. These updates will reflect factors such as state law changes, inflation, and average jury verdicts, ensuring the caps remain relevant over time. Another proposed rule change, set to take effect on May 10, 2024, alters how offsets are applied to compensation. Under this new plan, offsets will only impact economic damages, such as lost wages and medical expenses. For context, an analysis of claims data from 2021 and 2022 indicates that this adjustment could have increased compensation for a single claim by as much as $200,000.
What These Updates Mean for Military Families
These changes address long-standing concerns raised by military families, lawmakers, and advocacy groups about the inadequacy of previous compensation limits. While the updates mark progress, they are not without criticism. Manuel Vega, a Marine Corps veteran and founder of Save Our Servicemembers, highlighted the disparity:
"It’s important but it’s inadequate. It’s a very, very small concession when compared to medical malpractice cases that are being paid out in the civilian world".
The increased cap could mean up to an additional $150,000 in compensation for service members experiencing severe non-economic damages, such as permanent disability, chronic pain, or a diminished quality of life. Additionally, the proposed offset rule ensures that payments for government-provided medical care or disability benefits won’t reduce the overall malpractice award. These updates aim to offer some relief to service members and their families navigating the challenges of medical malpractice claims.
Current Compensation Limits and Who Can File Claims
The Pentagon has updated its policies to clarify compensation limits and eligibility requirements for military medical malpractice claims. These changes help service members and their families understand what compensation they might receive and whether they qualify to file a claim.
Non-Economic Damage Caps: Before and After the Update
One of the most notable updates is the increase in the cap for non-economic damages. These damages cover areas like pain and suffering, emotional distress, and diminished quality of life. As Air Force Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder, a Department of Defense spokesman, explained:
"The increase, up from the previous $600,000 cap, applies only to non-economic damages".
The new cap for non-economic damages is $750,000. Meanwhile, economic damages – such as lost wages, medical bills, and other direct financial losses – remain uncapped. This adjustment broadens the scope of compensation available to claimants.
Who Can File Claims
The updated policies also expand eligibility rules, allowing more individuals to file military medical malpractice claims. Historically, troops and veterans were barred from suing the Department of Defense for injuries or illnesses sustained during their service. However, the National Defense Authorization Act, passed in December 2019, changed that, opening the door for these claims.
Now, active-duty service members can file claims for nearly any injury or illness resulting from medical care provided at a military treatment facility by a DoD provider. In cases of death or incapacitation, a service member’s representative can also file claims for personal injury or wrongful death.
Reserve component service members face stricter guidelines. They are eligible to file claims only if the injury or death occurred while they were in federal duty status. Additionally, military families and retirees may file claims under specific conditions, which depend on factors like when and where the medical care occurred.
Claims must be submitted to the Department of Defense within two years of the alleged malpractice incident. According to Bloomberg Government, as of February 2024, 227 malpractice claims had been filed but not yet resolved, with the potential compensation amounting to $2.16 billion.
How Claims Are Paid: Pentagon vs. Treasury Department
Understanding how claims are paid is equally important for potential claimants. The military malpractice claims process serves as a last-resort option for compensation not available under other laws. Several limitations apply, including the fact that once a claim is resolved, the settlement is deemed "final and conclusive", with no option for judicial review.
Claims challenging discretionary agency policies are not considered, and the combatant activities exception applies in certain cases. However, such exceptions are rare and would likely involve extraordinary situations, such as an attack on a military hospital.
Legal Background and Case Law for Military Medical Malpractice Claims
Understanding the legal framework behind military medical malpractice claims sheds light on why recent Pentagon policy changes mark a major shift. For decades, legal precedents – most notably the Feres Doctrine – have limited service members’ ability to seek compensation for medical negligence. These new policies represent a meaningful development for military families.
How Feres v. United States Impacts Military Medical Malpractice Claims
The Feres Doctrine has been the primary obstacle preventing military personnel from filing medical malpractice claims against the government. Established by the Supreme Court in 1950 in Feres v. United States, this doctrine prohibits active-duty service members from suing the government for injuries sustained "incident to service". The Court justified this ruling by citing the unique federal-military relationship and the existing veterans’ compensation system. While the doctrine has broadly blocked lawsuits, exceptions have emerged in cases where incidents fall outside military service. For example, in Kathryn Spletstoser v. John Hyten, the 9th Circuit ruled that a sexual assault in a hotel room was not "incident to service". These longstanding restrictions set the stage for recent legislative reforms aimed at expanding the rights of service members to file claims.
New Laws Allowing Claims Against Military Doctors
In response to the constraints of the Feres Doctrine, Congress and the Department of Defense (DoD) have introduced reforms to address medical malpractice claims. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA) created a limited exception, allowing claims against Department of Defense healthcare providers for malpractice occurring in designated military treatment facilities.
One high-profile case that spurred legislative action was that of Master Sgt. Richard Stayskal, a Green Beret whose terminal lung cancer was misdiagnosed as pneumonia by military doctors. His case led Congress in 2019 to pass what is now known as the Stayskal Act. This legislation prompted the Defense Department to establish an internal compensation system in 2020, enabling military members to file malpractice claims for incidents occurring in military hospitals without going through traditional courts.
Further changes in 2022 reduced the Feres Doctrine’s reach in cases involving environmental and health-related injuries. These changes allowed service members and their families to file claims for damages caused by environmental exposure. For instance, more than 93,000 claims were filed in the first year following these adjustments, many of them related to contamination at Camp Lejeune.
In May 2024, the Final Rule introduced additional refinements, eliminating offsets for non-economic damages. According to DoD officials:
"The amendments to the regulation will allow some service members to receive compensation for noneconomic damages that they would not have been able to receive under the current regulation. The amendments afford some service members additional compensation".
Criticism of the Feres Doctrine continues to grow, with Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas remarking, "Feres is indefensible as a matter of law, and senseless as a matter of policy". Together, these legal updates and policy changes represent a significant evolution in military medical malpractice law, providing a more robust framework for military families seeking justice after decades of legal limitations.
sbb-itb-ed66764
How to File Military Medical Malpractice Claims
Filing a military medical malpractice claim requires navigating strict procedures and meeting tight deadlines, which can be particularly challenging for military families seeking compensation.
Steps in the Claims Process
The process starts with submitting Standard Form 95 to the appropriate agency. This form must outline the details of the alleged malpractice, describe the injury, and include a proposed amount for damages. Military families have a two-year window to file their claim, starting from the date they knew – or should have reasonably known – about both the injury and its cause.
Claims must be submitted directly to the military service branch involved. If mailed, the postmark determines whether the claim meets the deadline. The form must include the claim’s basis, the requested compensation amount, and the signature of the claimant or their representative.
When an attorney files on behalf of the claimant, an affidavit of authorization must also be included. If the malpractice isn’t easily identifiable to a layperson, the claim must include an affidavit confirming that a healthcare professional reviewed the case and found a breach in the standard of care.
Once the claim is submitted, the agency has six months to respond. During this time, they may offer a settlement, deny the claim, or remain silent. If the claim is denied or no decision is made within six months, claimants have an additional six months to file a lawsuit in a United States District Court.
The type of claim depends on where the malpractice occurred. For cases involving substandard care in U.S. facilities, the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) typically applies. For incidents at military facilities outside the United States, the Military Claims Act is generally used. However, claims denied under this act usually cannot be pursued further in court.
Following these steps carefully and promptly is critical to avoid missing deadlines.
Common Challenges in the Claims Process
Even with a clear process, claimants often face significant hurdles. Reports show that only 2.5% of the 448 medical malpractice claims filed with the Army, Navy, and Air Force have been resolved through settlements.
One major issue is the inherent conflict of interest in the review process. Sean Timmons, Managing Partner of Tully Rinckey law firm, highlights the problem:
"The military has deliberately avoided approving legitimate claims to save costs because Congress has not appropriated sufficient resources to compensate aggrieved parties. Additionally, the very people accused of misconduct are the ones themselves reviewing the allegations of malpractice and gross negligence".
Transparency is another challenge. Claimants often receive little information about the experts reviewing their cases or the reasoning behind claim denials. Attorney Natalie Khawam expressed frustration:
"We don’t know anything about this expert, whether he’s even board certified – nothing, not even a name. We can’t even see the expert’s decision".
Richard Stayskal, whose case inspired the Stayskal Act, shared his experience:
"It just feels like they can take an infinite amount of time, and let’s say 99 doctors agree that I was wronged, it was egregious, it was malpractice, it’s all clear, cut and dry; but they’re going to keep on going to no end to find the one that says: ‘Ah, no, no I totally disagree; that was never malpractice’".
The delays in resolving claims can have devastating outcomes. Some claimants have passed away while waiting for decisions on their cases. Dwight Stirling, CEO of the Center for Law and Military Policy, calls for reform:
"It’s a simple case of having the fox guard the hen house. These cases should be decided by a court of law in full view of the public, where the military has to show its documents and the doctors have to submit to depositions and an independent court and judge get to render a verdict".
Given these obstacles, military families may benefit greatly from working with legal professionals experienced in military medical malpractice claims. Attorneys familiar with the Federal Tort Claims Act and military procedures can help ensure proper documentation, meet filing requirements, and advocate for fair compensation. For example, firms like Archuleta Law Firm (https://veteransmedicalmalpractice.net) specialize in handling these complex cases.
Submitting a well-prepared and timely claim is essential for families seeking compensation, making it crucial to follow the outlined steps and seek expert guidance when needed.
How Policy Changes Affect Military Families and Legal Help
The Pentagon’s recent updates to medical malpractice policies have opened doors for military families to pursue fair compensation. However, navigating these changes requires a solid grasp of the benefits and the hurdles that remain in the claims process.
Real Effects on Families Seeking Compensation
The revised policies now allow military families to receive compensation for medical malpractice, marking a significant shift from the past. Key updates include a $750,000 cap on non-economic damages and new rules limiting offsets to economic damages only. These changes reflect progress compared to the complete ban on such claims that existed before 2021.
For families facing substantial losses, these updates are a step forward, but the claims process remains challenging. Since the 2019 law enabling such claims, only about 3% of medical malpractice claims from service members have been approved. By June 7, 2024, the military had received 597 claims and approved just 20. Here’s a breakdown:
- Army: 12 claims approved out of 258, totaling $3.3 million.
- Navy: 3 claims approved out of 188, worth $950,000.
- Air Force: 5 claims approved out of 151, totaling $75,325.
These low approval rates highlight the complexities involved, underscoring the need for specialized legal assistance to navigate the process effectively.
Getting Legal Help for Military Medical Malpractice Cases
With these policy updates come new challenges, especially in navigating the Federal Tort Claims Act. The review process often focuses more on procedural correctness than on the merits of the medical decisions involved, creating additional barriers for families.
Sean Timmons, managing partner of the Tully Rinckey law firm, points to systemic issues in the process:
"The military has deliberately avoided approving legitimate claims to save costs because Congress has not appropriated sufficient resources to compensate aggrieved parties".
The emotional burden on families is immense, compounded by the slow and opaque nature of the claims process. Dana White, whose son was a Navy Corpsman, shared his frustration:
"It is saddening; it is offensive to all these families and our men and women that go out there and put their life on the line for the abuse that the Department of Defense is giving them".
Legal firms specializing in military medical malpractice cases, like Archuleta Law Firm (https://veteransmedicalmalpractice.net), offer critical support. They handle cases involving misdiagnosis, surgical errors, birth injuries, wrongful death, and other types of medical negligence. With a doctor-attorney and nurse on staff, they provide free case evaluations and nationwide representation, ensuring families get the expertise they need.
While the updated policies offer new opportunities for compensation, the procedural challenges make professional legal guidance essential. With the right support, military families can better navigate the system and work toward the compensation they deserve.
Conclusion: Understanding Pentagon Policy Changes
Recent updates to Pentagon policies bring new compensation options for military families, but understanding and navigating these changes demands clarity and professional guidance. One key change is the increase in the cap on non-economic damages to $750,000, effective October 20, 2023. This adjustment – up $150,000 from the previous limit – aims to align with evolving state standards.
The revised policies also introduce opportunities for families to recover non-economic damages without reductions due to Department of Defense (DoD) or Veterans Affairs (VA) payments. Notably, these offsets now apply only to economic damages, which include factors like lost wages.
However, challenges remain. With claim approval rates hovering around 2% and total reported claims reaching $845 million, the procedural complexities of these cases can be overwhelming for families seeking justice.
A clear understanding of the distinction between economic and non-economic damages is essential under the new policies. While economic damages, such as lost income, remain uncapped, families must provide thorough documentation of future lost earnings to support their claims. The Department of Defense has acknowledged that these updates may allow some service members to qualify for compensation that would have been unavailable under previous rules. This highlights the importance of specialized legal representation, particularly in cases involving military healthcare and malpractice.
Given the complexity of these policy changes and the historically low approval rates, seeking expert legal assistance is critical. Military medical malpractice cases require in-depth knowledge of both the Federal Tort Claims Act and the specific nuances of military healthcare systems. Firms like Archuleta Law Firm (https://veteransmedicalmalpractice.net) are equipped with the legal and medical expertise necessary to guide families through these intricate processes.
While these updates signify progress, they also emphasize the need for skilled legal advocacy to ensure military families receive the compensation they deserve.
FAQs
What do the recent Pentagon updates on medical malpractice caps mean for military families seeking compensation?
The Pentagon has increased the maximum compensation for military medical malpractice claims, now allowing payouts of up to $750,000 for cases involving negligence at Defense Department hospitals or by military doctors. This adjustment is intended to offer better financial support to military families dealing with the consequences of medical mistakes.
Another important update specifies that offsets for government payments will apply solely to economic damages. This clarification could influence how compensation is calculated and distributed. These changes mark an effort to simplify the claims process and provide fairer resolutions for those impacted by medical malpractice within the military healthcare system.
What challenges do military families face when filing medical malpractice claims under the updated Pentagon policies?
Military families encounter significant hurdles when pursuing medical malpractice claims under the Pentagon’s revised policies. One of the biggest issues is the extremely low approval rate – only about 2% of claims are accepted. On top of that, the process often drags on for years, creating prolonged emotional and financial burdens for families already coping with the consequences of medical errors.
The situation is further complicated by recent policy changes and legal rulings, which have introduced difficult procedural barriers. These make it even more challenging for families to navigate the system and obtain fair compensation. Understanding these updated policies and working with skilled legal professionals is crucial to improving the likelihood of a successful outcome.
What is the Feres Doctrine, and how do recent updates impact military medical malpractice claims?
The Feres Doctrine is a legal rule that stops active-duty service members from suing the federal government for injuries tied to their military service, including cases involving medical malpractice. While this principle has been in place for decades, it has drawn criticism for leaving service members with limited legal recourse when harmed by negligence.
Recent policy changes have sought to address some of these concerns. Although the Feres Doctrine still applies to active-duty personnel, new avenues have been created for dependents, veterans, and retirees to file medical malpractice claims. These updates are designed to offer better compensation options for those impacted by medical errors within the military healthcare system.